Oh shocks....
Posible ba to?
Yung din tinatanong ko sa mga experto.
Syempre di pa raw nila masasagot "so far"
Ako naman, magpoposing tulad ni undertaker for 5 secs, tapos ipagmamalaki "I just went 5 secs in to the future"
We dont know how to time travel yet, but they have a lot of ideas how we "could"...
1) FTL (Faster-than-light travel) - Ibig sabihin e sasakay tayo sa sasakyang mas mabilis ang takbo kesa sa liwanag.
Ang principle? Uunahan natin yung information bago ito mapercieve.
Ang kaadikan sa method na ito ay
a) Light is the fastest thing in the universe (so far)
b) We have no means of travelling in the speed of light, let alone FASTER than light.
2)Wormhole - Ibig sabihin, dadaan tayo sa butas na gawa ng mga uod............ Joke.... Ibig sabihin, kelangan nating dumaan sa isang wormhole para makarating from point A to Point B faster than going to Point A to Point B without entering a wormhole... Naintindihan?
Papasimplehin ko, Kelangan nating maunahan yung information bago ito makarating sa isa pang point, parang FTL lang. Kung mauunahan natin kasi ang takbo ng information, makakarating tayo sa point kung saan di pa nagaganap yung information.
Example, Nakabasag ka ng Tasa. Pag pumasok ka sa wormhole mauunahan mo yung information na nabasag yung tasa so in turn, makakarating ka sa time na hindi pa basag yung tasa kasi naunahan mo yung information na basag na sya.
Parehas lang ng principle ang FTL at Wormholes
Magulo? Isipin mo nalang na Wala akong sinabi,
3) UNIVERSE JUMPING! - TATALON TAYO FROM UNIVERSE TO UNIVERSE.
HOW? WE DONT KNOW..
Ano ang priciple sa likod nito...
Everytime you make a move, may nabubuong ibang universe...
Gets?
Example, Coffee or Milk tapos Milk Pinili mo. Sa ibang universe Coffee Pinili mo. (Simple lang to for information sake)
ngayon, sabihin nating sa universe na to kung saan pinili mo e milk, namatayan ka ng aso, kasi yung gatas mo ay ininom mo tapos *put seemingly odd but plausible scenario that leads to the death of your dog*. Kaya ayun, gusto mo iligtas aso mo from death kaya babalik ka sa past.
Pwede kang pumunta sa universe kung pipili ka palang kung at Coffee ang piliin mo. :D
Ang problema, dalawa na kayo dun, ikaw na nag time travel papunta sa universe na yun at ikaw na nagexist na sa universe na yun.
-ang susunod na mababasa ay bawal sa mga walang dark humor-
(Pero mareremedyuhan yun kung pupunta ka sa universe kung san namatay ung isang ikaw a little while before making the decision, kelangan mo nga lang itago yung bangkay)
-end of dark humor-
Wala na ko madagdag... Tinatamad na ko... Isip nalang kayo ng paraan para makapag time travel...
O kaya gayahin nyo nalang ako
*Pogi pose for 5 secs*
Just Went 5 secs into the future again. ;)
Showing posts with label physics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label physics. Show all posts
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
The Carbon the Universe
What caused the abundance of Carbon in the universe?
A child prodigy calculated that it is impossible for the big bang to cause it.
I think his numbers (i.e. assume % of Carbon in the Universe, age of the universe etc.) are off that's why he thought of that after calculating it in his head...
I suck at math... But i have to admit, math only PROVES, not disprove (which is how science work)...
Remember that equation that PROVES bumblebees shouldn't fly?
Modification of the same equation PROVED the opposite.
Math could be deceiving... :D
If you would think about it, the abundance of the carbon could be attributed to the supernovae exploding in different parts of the universe..
Heavy atoms were made in the core of these dying stars by nuclear fusion and were scattered to outer space after its explosion.
Think about this...
Big Bang = hydrogen,
Supernova = Heavy elements,
Calculations are off : High percentage of Carbon in universe = Impossible.
If only i'm good in math, ill show you what i think...
I just want to say that there could be alot more dying stars than we think (assuming that there really is a lot of carbon in the universe)
or
there could be less carbon in the universe than what we think (assuming the number of supernova that the universe COULD accomodate [in terms of time] has been determined with high accuracy)
or
BOTH
_____
Also, if ever he is right that the Big Bang couldn't be responsible for the abundant carbon,
i think that rapid super cooling after (super) heating could have caused the hydroden and/or helium atoms to fuse then the atoms produced would break off again after (super) heating then fuse again...
"H+H -> He -> [H + H] + H -> Li -> [He + H] + H -> Br -> [He + H + H] + H -> [He + He ] + H -> B
ETC... That was just a guess....
or ... It could be possible that the Big Bang actually scattered Radioactive Element(s) that subsequently decayed into the atoms that are present today. What if the big bang was actually a big decay?
or ... Or maybe, after the creation of hydrogen atoms after the big bang, the creation for other atoms countinued to the point that there were no more H atoms and the Heaviest atoms were formed? then those atoms decayed scaterring Atoms all over the place. :D
_________
Wild Ideas.... They're just waiting to be disproven...
A child prodigy calculated that it is impossible for the big bang to cause it.
I think his numbers (i.e. assume % of Carbon in the Universe, age of the universe etc.) are off that's why he thought of that after calculating it in his head...
I suck at math... But i have to admit, math only PROVES, not disprove (which is how science work)...
Remember that equation that PROVES bumblebees shouldn't fly?
Modification of the same equation PROVED the opposite.
Math could be deceiving... :D
If you would think about it, the abundance of the carbon could be attributed to the supernovae exploding in different parts of the universe..
Heavy atoms were made in the core of these dying stars by nuclear fusion and were scattered to outer space after its explosion.
Think about this...
Big Bang = hydrogen,
Supernova = Heavy elements,
Calculations are off : High percentage of Carbon in universe = Impossible.
If only i'm good in math, ill show you what i think...
I just want to say that there could be alot more dying stars than we think (assuming that there really is a lot of carbon in the universe)
or
there could be less carbon in the universe than what we think (assuming the number of supernova that the universe COULD accomodate [in terms of time] has been determined with high accuracy)
or
BOTH
_____
Also, if ever he is right that the Big Bang couldn't be responsible for the abundant carbon,
i think that rapid super cooling after (super) heating could have caused the hydroden and/or helium atoms to fuse then the atoms produced would break off again after (super) heating then fuse again...
"H+H -> He -> [H + H] + H -> Li -> [He + H] + H -> Br -> [He + H + H] + H -> [He + He ] + H -> B
ETC... That was just a guess....
or ... It could be possible that the Big Bang actually scattered Radioactive Element(s) that subsequently decayed into the atoms that are present today. What if the big bang was actually a big decay?
or ... Or maybe, after the creation of hydrogen atoms after the big bang, the creation for other atoms countinued to the point that there were no more H atoms and the Heaviest atoms were formed? then those atoms decayed scaterring Atoms all over the place. :D
_________
Wild Ideas.... They're just waiting to be disproven...
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Brazil Nut Effect...
Naalala ko yung time na binigyan ako ng kaklase ko ng Macadamia Nuts...
Pag ninaalog ko yung lalagyan, nag ririse yung mga mas malalaking nuts...
Pinagisipan ko, paano yun nangyayari...
Well... Nagtitimpla ako ng gatas nung naalala ko nung nag sasalin ng asukal yung nanay ko sa lalagyan...
Inaalog nya yung lalagyan tapos biglang bumababa yung level nung asukal....
Tinanong ko dati bakit ganun, ang sagot napupunta sa ilalim yung mas maliliit na asukal :)
Ganun din sa Nuts... Malalaglag yun maliliit na nuts tapos mag ririse yung malalaki (dahil nasa ibabaw na sila nung maliliit)...
I searched for the Fancy term dun sa phenomenon na yun at nalaman ko na yun pala ang tinatawag na...
Tenent!
Brazil Nut Effect. :)
Apparently, dati pa pala nila iniisip kung paano yun nangyayari.
Now you know... (or at least Now you know the Fancy term for it)
Cool No? :D
P.S. Sino kang Jejemon ka? Wala lang, nakakatuwa ka... Haha
Pag ninaalog ko yung lalagyan, nag ririse yung mga mas malalaking nuts...
Pinagisipan ko, paano yun nangyayari...
Well... Nagtitimpla ako ng gatas nung naalala ko nung nag sasalin ng asukal yung nanay ko sa lalagyan...
Inaalog nya yung lalagyan tapos biglang bumababa yung level nung asukal....
Tinanong ko dati bakit ganun, ang sagot napupunta sa ilalim yung mas maliliit na asukal :)
Ganun din sa Nuts... Malalaglag yun maliliit na nuts tapos mag ririse yung malalaki (dahil nasa ibabaw na sila nung maliliit)...
I searched for the Fancy term dun sa phenomenon na yun at nalaman ko na yun pala ang tinatawag na...
Tenent!
Brazil Nut Effect. :)
Apparently, dati pa pala nila iniisip kung paano yun nangyayari.
Now you know... (or at least Now you know the Fancy term for it)
Cool No? :D
P.S. Sino kang Jejemon ka? Wala lang, nakakatuwa ka... Haha
Labels:
Daily Life,
physics,
Trivias
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Matter Waves?
simple...
ito ay waves ng matter...
matter is made out of particles...
so matter waves are waves of particles...
ang wavelength ng particle at inversely proportional sa momentum ng particle.
sa mga di alam ang inversely proportional...
ang wavelength ng particle ay lumiliit pag mas malaki ang momentum ng particle.
at ang frequency nito (no. ng cycles per unit time) ay directly proportional sa kinetic energy ng particle o lumalaki pag mas malaki ang kinetic energy ng particle.
Masyadong malaki ang momentum ng tao kaya masyadong maliit ang wavelength natin (About 10−35 meter or smaller)... That small would be undetectable to any current measuring tools.
pero para sa electron na may napakaliit na momentum observable ang wave-like properties ng particle...
ito ay waves ng matter...
matter is made out of particles...
so matter waves are waves of particles...
ang wavelength ng particle at inversely proportional sa momentum ng particle.
sa mga di alam ang inversely proportional...
ang wavelength ng particle ay lumiliit pag mas malaki ang momentum ng particle.
at ang frequency nito (no. ng cycles per unit time) ay directly proportional sa kinetic energy ng particle o lumalaki pag mas malaki ang kinetic energy ng particle.
Masyadong malaki ang momentum ng tao kaya masyadong maliit ang wavelength natin (About 10−35 meter or smaller)... That small would be undetectable to any current measuring tools.
pero para sa electron na may napakaliit na momentum observable ang wave-like properties ng particle...
Labels:
physics
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Uncertain? You are... Always...
Look at anything that appears to be stationary...
Its just there... not moving...
But are you sure its really there?
Actually you can never be sure that its there due to the fact that its position is uncertain...
Well, hindi mo sya maobserve due to the fact na ung uncertainty sa position ay masyadong maliit...
Lahat ng bagay ay may degree ng uncertainty.
Dahil sa
Heisenberg Uncertainty principle na nagsasabi na ang position at momentum ng isang bagay ay hindi pwedeng maging certain at the same time.
Yan ang Physical Explanation dyan....
Marami pang ibang explanation...
Just ask...
P.S. Pasensya na kasi nakakanose bleed uli tong entry ko... nxt tym papasimplehin ko pa... Sorry...
Its just there... not moving...
But are you sure its really there?
Actually you can never be sure that its there due to the fact that its position is uncertain...
Well, hindi mo sya maobserve due to the fact na ung uncertainty sa position ay masyadong maliit...
Lahat ng bagay ay may degree ng uncertainty.
Dahil sa
Heisenberg Uncertainty principle na nagsasabi na ang position at momentum ng isang bagay ay hindi pwedeng maging certain at the same time.
Yan ang Physical Explanation dyan....
Marami pang ibang explanation...
Just ask...
P.S. Pasensya na kasi nakakanose bleed uli tong entry ko... nxt tym papasimplehin ko pa... Sorry...
Labels:
physics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)